Barelds, D. P. H., & Barelds-Dijkstra, P. (2007). Links certainly one of companion identity trait similarity, relationships onset, relationships quality, and you will like. [ Links ]

Baxter, L. Good., & West, L. (2003). Pair attitudes of its similarities and you will variations: An excellent dialectical direction. Record regarding Private and you will Personal Matchmaking, 20, 491-514. [ Hyperlinks ]

Berscheid, Age. (1985)patibility, interdependence, and you may feeling. When you look at the W. Ickes (Ed.), Appropriate and you will in conflict matchmaking (pp. 143-161). Nyc: Springer-Verlag. [ Links ]

Berscheid, E., Dion, K., Walster, Age., & Walster, G. W. (1971). Actual elegance and you will matchmaking solutions: A test of one’s matching hypothesis. Record regarding Fresh Public Psychology, eight, 173-189. [ Hyperlinks ]

Log off Public and personal Relationship, 24, 479-496

Berscheid, E., & Regan, P. (2005). Brand new psychology from social relationships. Upper Saddle Lake, NJ: Pearson Studies (Prentice Hallway). [ Website links ]

Berger, C. Roentgen. (1975). Activity show and you will attributional communication due to the fact determinants of social appeal. Address Monographs, forty, 280-286. [ Backlinks ]

Berscheid, E., & Reis, H. T. (1998). Attraction and you can close relationships. Within the D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & Grams. Lindzey (Eds.), The latest handbook out of societal therapy (Vol. dos, next ed. Pp. 193-281). Nyc: McGraw-Mountain. [ Links ]

Buckwalter, J. Grams., Carter, S. Roentgen., Forgatch, G. T. Parsons, T. D., & Warren, Letter. C. (2004, May 11). You.S. Patent six,735,568. Arizona, DC. [ Hyperlinks ]

Buckwalter, J. G., Carter, S. R., Forgatch, Grams. T. Parsons, T. D., & Warren, N. C. (2008, Late. 18). U.S. Patent 7,454,357B2. Arizona, DC. [ Website links ]

Buss, D. M. (1984). Relationship range to possess identification dispositions: Investigations which have three other research provide. Choices Family genes, fourteen, 111-123. [ Hyperlinks ]

Byrne, D., & Rhamey, R. (1965). Magnitude off negative and positive reinforcements as the an excellent determinant of attraction. Log off Personality and you may Societal Mindset, dos, 884-889. [ Backlinks ]

Carter, S. Roentgen. (2005, Feb.), To own modern-big date Cupids, study replaces relationship: Emotional research was trailing new winning suits produced on eHarmony. Association to own Psychological Technology Observer, 18. Downloaded off [ Backlinks ]

Carter, S. Roentgen., & Buckwalter, J. G. (2009). Increasing partner selection over the internet: An assessment away from matchmaking top quality between marriage ceremonies as a result of an on-line matchmaking system and you can marriage ceremonies as a result of unfettered selection. Interpersona: An international Record into Personal Matchmaking, step 3, 105-125. [ Website links ]

Carter, S., & Snow, C. (2004, May). Providing singles enter finest marriage ceremonies playing with predictive models of relationship success. Paper exhibited during the 16th Yearly Seminar of your own American Psychological Area. [ Links ]

Approach and you will system for determining individuals who are planning enjoys a successful relationship

C). How does identity count into the ination out of feature stress, negativity, and you may relationship fulfillment. Diary of Personality and you will Social Therapy, 78, 326-336. [ Backlinks ]

Clark, Yards. S. (1985). Effects away from relationship variety of getting expertise compatibility. In W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and you can incompatible matchmaking (pp. 119-140). Nyc: Springer-Verlag. [ Links ]

Coombs, Roentgen. H., & Kenkel, W. F. (1966). Sex differences in matchmaking ambition and satisfaction which have computer system-put up people. Diary from ily, twenty eight, 62-66. [ Hyperlinks ]

Cooper, An excellent., & Sportolari, L. (1997). Relationship in cyberspace: Understanding on line interest. Record out of Sex Training and Treatment, 22, 7-fourteen. [ Hyperlinks ]

Egyptiska kvinnlig

Dijkstra, P., & Barelds, D. P. H. (2008). Create people know very well what needed: The same or complementary spouse? Evolutionary Mindset, 6, 595-602. [ Links ]

Feingold, A good. (1988). Coordinating to possess appeal inside close lovers and you will exact same-sex members of the family: A good meta-data and you may theoretical feedback. Emotional Bulletin, 104, 226-235. [ Hyperlinks ]

Felmlee, D. H. (2001). Out of popular with terrible: Disenchantment that have an enchanting partner. Sociological Perspectives, 49, 263-280. [ Links ]